0.00/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.11/0.31	% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
0.11/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.31	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.31	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.31	% CPULimit   : 960
0.11/0.31	% WCLimit    : 120
0.11/0.31	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 03:19:56 EDT 2022
0.16/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.43	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.16/0.43	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.16/0.43	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting sh2lt with 480s (4) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# post_as_ho1 with pid 23873 completed with status 0
0.16/0.44	# Result found by post_as_ho1
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting sh2lt with 480s (4) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.44	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF21-SHHFFMBN
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting pre_casc_2 with 44s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# pre_casc_2 with pid 23878 completed with status 0
0.16/0.44	# Result found by pre_casc_2
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting sh2lt with 480s (4) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.44	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF21-SHHFFMBN
0.16/0.44	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.16/0.44	# Starting pre_casc_2 with 44s (1) cores
0.16/0.44	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.16/0.44	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.16/0.44	
0.16/0.44	# Proof found!
0.16/0.44	# SZS status Theorem
0.16/0.44	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_23, type, esk1_2: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_24, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_25, type, esk3_1: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_26, type, epred2_0: $i > $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_27, type, epred3_1: $i > $i > $o).
0.16/0.44	thf(decl_28, type, esk4_2: $i > ($i > $o) > $i).
0.16/0.44	thf(cTHM2A_ONE_pme, conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > $i > $o]:((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X4)<=(X2 @ X4)))=>![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X4)<=(X1 @ X2 @ X4)))))=>![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ (^[X4:$i]:(?[X6:$i > $o]:(((X6 @ X4)&![X7:$i]:(((X1 @ X6 @ X7)<=(X6 @ X7))))))) @ X5)=>?[X6:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X6 @ X4)=>(X1 @ X6 @ X4)))&(X6 @ X5))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM2A_ONE_pme)).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:($i > $o) > $i > $o]:((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X4)=>(X3 @ X4)))=>![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X4)=>(X1 @ X3 @ X4)))))=>![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(?[X6:$i > $o]:(((X6 @ Z0)&![X7:$i]:(((X1 @ X6 @ X7)<=(X6 @ X7))))))) @ X5)=>?[X6:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X6 @ X4)=>(X1 @ X6 @ X4)))&(X6 @ X5)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM2A_ONE_pme])])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X17:$i > $o, X18:$i > $o, X20:$i, X22:$i > $o]:(((((X17 @ (esk1_2 @ X17 @ X18))|(~(epred1_0 @ X17 @ X20)|(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X20)))&(~(X18 @ (esk1_2 @ X17 @ X18))|(~(epred1_0 @ X17 @ X20)|(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X20))))&((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(?[X6:$i > $o]:(((X6 @ Z0)&![X7:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X6 @ X7)<=(X6 @ X7))))))) @ esk2_0)&(((X22 @ (esk3_1 @ X22))|~(X22 @ esk2_0))&(~(epred1_0 @ X22 @ (esk3_1 @ X22))|~(X22 @ esk2_0)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X27:$i, X29:$i, X30:$i, X31:$i > $o]:(((((epred3_1 @ X27 @ X27)|~(epred2_0 @ X27))&(~(epred3_1 @ X27 @ X29)|(epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X27) @ X29)|~(epred2_0 @ X27)))&(((X31 @ (esk4_2 @ X30 @ X31))|~(X31 @ X30)|(epred2_0 @ X30))&(~(epred1_0 @ X31 @ (esk4_2 @ X30 @ X31))|~(X31 @ X30)|(epred2_0 @ X30))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[])])])])])])])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))|(epred1_0 @ X3 @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X5:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (epred3_1 @ X4) @ X5)|~((epred3_1 @ X4 @ X5))|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X26:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ X26)<=>?[X24:$i > $o]:(((X24 @ X26)&![X25:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X24 @ X25)<=(X24 @ X25))))))), introduced(definition)).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)|~((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2)))|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X4 @ X2)))|~((X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X4 @ X2))|(epred2_0 @ X4)|~((X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X5:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred3_1 @ X4 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred3_1 @ X4) @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ X5)|~((epred3_1 @ X4 @ X5))|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X4:$i]:(((epred3_1 @ X4 @ X4)|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|~((X2 @ esk2_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (((epred1_0 @ epred2_0 @ esk2_0))=(($true))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]), c_0_6])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i, X5:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)|~((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred3_1 @ X5) @ X2)))|~((epred3_1 @ X5 @ X4))|~((epred2_0 @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_5])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X4:$i, X5:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ X4)|~((epred3_1 @ X5 @ X4))|~((epred2_0 @ X5)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_5]), c_0_9])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred3_1 @ X4 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred3_1 @ X4) @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk3_1 @ (epred1_0 @ X3)))|~((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2)))|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ esk2_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_12])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ epred2_0 @ esk2_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)|~((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred3_1 @ X4) @ X2)))|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_11])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred3_1 @ X4) @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk3_1 @ (epred1_0 @ X3)))|(X3 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ esk2_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_12])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk3_1 @ (epred1_0 @ epred2_0)))|~((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ epred2_0 @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ epred2_0 @ X4)|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk3_1 @ (epred1_0 @ epred2_0)))|(epred2_0 @ (esk1_2 @ epred2_0 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_18])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:((~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))|~((X2 @ esk2_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (epred1_0 @ epred2_0) @ (esk3_1 @ (epred1_0 @ epred2_0))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_24])).
0.16/0.44	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26]), c_0_18])]), ['proof']).
0.16/0.44	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.16/0.44	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.16/0.44	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.16/0.44	# Initial clauses                      : 9
0.16/0.44	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.16/0.44	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
0.16/0.44	# Processed clauses                    : 56
0.16/0.44	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.16/0.44	# ...subsumed                          : 9
0.16/0.44	# ...remaining for further processing  : 47
0.16/0.44	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.16/0.44	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.16/0.44	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.16/0.44	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.16/0.44	# Generated clauses                    : 95
0.16/0.44	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 79
0.16/0.44	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.16/0.44	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
0.16/0.44	# Paramodulations                      : 95
0.16/0.44	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.16/0.44	# NegExts                              : 0
0.16/0.44	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.16/0.44	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.16/0.44	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.16/0.44	# Current number of processed clauses  : 37
0.16/0.44	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.16/0.44	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.16/0.44	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.16/0.44	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 32
0.16/0.44	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 37
0.16/0.44	# ...number of literals in the above   : 123
0.16/0.44	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.16/0.44	# Current number of archived clauses   : 10
0.16/0.44	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 163
0.16/0.44	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 128
0.16/0.44	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
0.16/0.44	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
0.16/0.44	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.16/0.44	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.16/0.44	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.16/0.44	# Condensation attempts                : 56
0.16/0.44	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.16/0.44	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 2923
0.16/0.44	
0.16/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.44	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.16/0.44	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.16/0.44	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.16/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1888 pages
0.16/0.44	
0.16/0.44	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.44	# User time                : 0.008 s
0.16/0.44	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.16/0.44	# Total time               : 0.011 s
0.16/0.44	# Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
0.16/0.44	EOF
